Saturday, November 10, 2012

DIVISION IS NOT THE SOLUTION



It is impressive to read your comments, thoughts, and criticisms on my blogs and posts; it gives me confident that you understand what I mean. The only issue I noticed in your thoughts, comments, and criticisms was: there are ecclesiological terminologies which are systematically used in theology, that you are not conversant with them. For example the context which scripture, tradition, experience and reason are used in Wesleyan theology.
May this article will shed more light, in the message was trying to pass across.
Former U.S president John F. Kennedy (1961) once says “Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us.” His 1961 address to the Canadian parliament is stuck in my brain, and I believed we can learn a lot from his inspiration.
As believer in Christ we enjoyed common interests, although we often see things differently, our common ground is greater and much more important than what we disagree on. We agree that Jesus Christ is the head of the Church, and He has called each one of us to fellowship with him; this is awesome.
For years, I have been concerned for the tenor of our collective discourse. I have witnessed how we evolve into an “us versus them” attitude that blocks our ability to compromise on matters of our common good.
Drawing from the pass history of our founding fathers, I cannot tell you how many times I witnessed well-intentioned Christians in absolute deadlock over issues. What is happening now?
What I am suggesting is that, we need to stop opposing each other just because of our professional, political, social or organizational views and instead ask each other what we can do collectively to make our Church better?
One of the lessons I have learned while studying in the U.S is, to stop accusing people of the same offense I am guilty of, instead I should take full responsibilities of my actions. So here are some take home:
-          Let’s follow the great example of our founding fathers (unity in diversity).

-          Let’s disagree to agree.

-          Let’s realize there is much to gain, to loose.

-          Let’s us sacrifice for the sake of our common good, and work as a team. A diverse group of people at worked, without regard to who got the credit, in the best interest of our Church.
Don Stamper (2005) once said “Let us join together and talk about our futures, needs and desires and respect each other’s positions and our differences establishing new coalitions. Let’s pick some initiatives and look at how we can work together and embrace our differences of opinions” Building and maintaining a church that meets our spiritual, cultural, social, economic, recreational, health and educational needs must be where we place our energies. And let us remember, “What unites us is greater than what divides us.”  
(I will appreciate your thoughts, comments, and critique. This is an abstract from material I prepared to present at the seminar which will be co-facilitating, at Africa University Zimbabwe in January, 2013).

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

BISHOP JOHN WESLEY YOHANNA AND 13 OTHER NEWLY ELECTED UMC BISHOPS SHARED THEIR VISION IN THE COUNCIL OF BISHOPS MEETING


They minister in very different circumstances, and their areas confront very different challenges from the destruction of recent hurricanes to the ravages of diseases such as AIDS and malaria.

But, the 14 new bishops elected around the globe this summer and fall do share one goal in common — increasing the number of vital United Methodist congregations. Such congregations are on a trajectory of growth, and they reach out to a hurting world.

In November 2010, the United Methodist Council of Bishops committed itself to making congregational vitality the church’s “true first priority” for at least a decade. Fostering vitality is on the agenda as the council, including its newest members, meets this week at Epworth-by-the-Sea retreat center on St. Simons Island, Ga.

Bishops agree the denomination as a whole faces struggles ahead. The United Methodist Church is still growing overall. However, the denomination’s U.S. membership continues its decades-long decline. The order of the day is to reverse this slide in U.S. worshippers, strengthen the church worldwide and fulfill the denomination’s mission of making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world.

The 14 new bishops in the United States, Africa and Eurasia are developing their own ideas about how best to reach these goals.

Here are some of the ways they are going about fostering vitality.

Listening

For many bishops, it is too soon to announce any specific plans. They are still engaged in listening sessions with clergy and lay people in the conferences they lead.

Bishop Jonathan Holston, the first bishop elected this year, told the South Carolina Annual (regional) Conference, that he is going to concentrate on listening, visiting and observing as much as possible in the days and months to come.

“With the assistance of conference leadership, it is my hope that we will discover the future God has for all of us,” he said in a Sept. 24 column in the South Carolina United Methodist Advocate.

Bishop Debra Wallace-Padgett, who now leads the North Alabama Conference, also said she is still working through a process to discern the priorities of the conference.

She has met with conference leaders and teams, and through November she plans to visit each district in the conference to meet with both clergy and laity, she told Danette Clifton, the conference’s director of communications. In December, Wallace-Padgett plans to meet with her cabinet to process what they have heard during the listening sessions, and then identify priorities. Meanwhile, her theme when she preaches at the conference’s churches has been renewal.

Bishop Gabriel Unda Yemba leads the new East Congo Episcopal Area in the Democratic Republic of Congo where the church is growing rapidly but the people live under the threat of rape and other atrocities by the M23 militia.

“My plan is to inspect the entire episcopal area and ascertain the needs of the various ministries of the church and then find ways of creating an effective delivery system for the development of East Congo,” he said through an interpreter after his election.

“It is my sincere hope that by the grace of God to see this episcopal area develop from its ashes to a livable and peaceable area,” he added.

In his “listening tour” in the New York Conference, Bishop Martin McLee has told church leaders that he does not “have a master plan for New York and Connecticut, but I serve a Master with a plan.”

However, he did offer some specifics at a clergy retreat Oct. 1–2 in Stony Point, N.Y. He said he is “expecting excellence” from clergy and expects a conference group to lay out parameters for determining excellence. He also said congregations and clergy must be better prepared for cross-cultural appointments in a structured, intentional way.

Praying

Just as they are listening to their fellow United Methodists, the new bishops are also seeking the Holy Spirit’s guidance in developing their plans.

Bishop Young Jin Cho, who leads the Virginia Conference, said during his installation service that the fundamental issue facing the denomination is a spiritual one. “No spiritual vitality, no vital congregations,” he preached.

Rediscovering “our spiritual vitality must begin with the bending of our knees in prayer,” he said. “We human beings cannot create spiritual vitality for our churches. We are not messiahs. Spiritual vitality is God’s gift to the church.”

He promised to be a “praying bishop” and to visit all Virginia Conference churches and pastors each month in his prayers.

Bishop Sandra Steiner Ball, who leads the West Virginia Conference, issued a prayer challenge to conference members in her first sermon. She asked that during lunchtime each day, West Virginia United Methodists ponder where they have seen Christ at work and where they have missed Christ at work and ask God to give them “the eyes of Christ, the ears of Christ and the courage of Christ to risk faithful acts and actions in this world.”

Similarly, in her Oct. 21 installation service, Bishop Cynthia Fierro Harvey urged members of the Louisiana Conference that she now leads to pray at 1 p.m. daily for church leaders, the Louisiana Conference and the broader United Methodist Church. She has asked Louisiana United Methodists to continue the practice until Advent.

“My prayer every day is that God will continue to use you to shape and form incredible people, vital, life-changing, disciple-making communities of faith,” she preached. “Disciples are not made at General Conference. They are not even made at annual conference. They’re made in communities like yours, where churches like yours are serving not in buildings but at the intersection of people’s lives.”

Imagining

Some new bishops are encouraging their fellow United Methodists to envision a more vital and spirit-filled future.

In his installation service, Bishop Gary E. Mueller asked the Arkansas Conference “to imagine what it’s like for us to be a church, a church filled with people who have been … filled with so much grace and love just the way we are that the only thing we can do is just share it with other people.”

In his column for the Arkansas United Methodist newspaper, he has been outlining his expectations. In addition to disciple-making, he has invited his conference’s congregations to raise $1 million for Imagine No Malaria, the denomination’s fight against the disease.

Bishop Mark J. Webb gave the title “Imagine” to his Upper New York Conference installation service sermon.

“God will use us to make disciples for Jesus Christ so the world will be changed,” he said, and people have a choice “to hold onto our reality or we can imagine God’s reality.”

In his introductory video, Bishop Michael McKee told the North Texas Conference that he feels “like we have a powerful presence of United Methodist witness in this particular annual conference.

“And over the coming years … we are going to expand that presence in such a way that people will know that we care deeply about their human hurts and their human hopes,” he added.

Taking steps

Bishop Eduard Khegay will not take on his new role in the Eurasia Episcopal Area until January 2013. But as a nominee for bishop, he recommended 10 steps for strengthening the United Methodist presence in an area that stretches across 11 time zones and spans Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine, Kazahkstan and other former Soviet Republics. 

Among those steps are developing an institute for mentoring and spiritual formation, launching risk-taking missions and centering churches on the small-group experience and serving.

He is among the bishops offering concrete steps to address the challenges they see in their areas.

Bishop Kenneth H. Carter, in his blog, is urging the Florida Conference to reach out to seekers, especially young women and men “who are searching for communities that will mentor or disciple them in a walk with God.”

Bishop William T. McAlilly, who leads the Nashville Area that encompasses the Tennessee and Memphis conferences, has announced goals for his first 100 days, first year and by 2020. In the first 100 days, he wants to begin moving the two conferences in his area toward alignment. By 2020, he wants Nashville Area United Methodists to be reaching one new disciple for every member annually and to have started two or more new congregations for every one that has closed. He also wants the area to recruit 10 new clergy a year above the current average and raise the number of healthy congregations by 50 percent.

Bishop John Wesley Yohanna leads United Methodists in Nigeria, the country with the world’s second-highest number of people — 3.3 million — living with HIV and AIDS.

“I will work hard to restore the functionality of the hospitals and health centers within the episcopal area,” he said. “We need skilled volunteers, sufficient medical equipment and drugs to keep our medical institutions running. Once we have the machinery in place, we would be ready to combat malaria and HIV effectively.”

He also is leading three annual conferences that have seen internecine struggles among church members. Thirteen Nigerian delegates boycotted his election.

“My prayer for Nigeria Episcopal Area is to restore peace in the Nigeria UMC by going to the people, discussing with the people and finding solutions together with the people,” he said.


*Hahn is a multimedia reporter for United Methodist News Service. Danette Clifton, the North Alabama Conference director of communications, contributed to this story

 

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

UMC JUDICIAL COUNCIL FALL 2012 SITTING ROUNDUP GUARANTEED APPOINTMENT UPHELD


The UMC Judicial Council in it just concluded fall 2012 sitting has upheld the long stand guaranteed appointment of UMC clergy. Though I am a huge fan of clergy excellent performance, yet I still felt the General Conference “missional purpose” which calls for abolishment of guaranteed appointment is ambiguous.  Hence the decision of the council:

“Security of appointment has long been a part of the tradition of The United Methodist Church and its predecessor bodies. Abolishing security of appointment would destroy our historic plan for our itinerant superintendency. Fair process procedures, trials and appeals are integral parts of the privilege of our clergy of right to trial by a committee and of appeal and is an absolute right which cannot be eradicated by legislation. The amendments to ¶ 337, as contained in Calendar Item 355, are unconstitutional and violate the third and fourth restrictive rules of the Constitution. The original ¶ 337 of the Discipline is restored and maintained and the changes made thereto at 2012 General Conference are null, void and of no effect. The amendments to ¶ 321, as contained in Calendar Items 352, is also declared repugnant to the Constitution and hence, unconstitutional. The original ¶ 321 of the Discipline is restored and maintained, and the changes made thereto by the 2012 General Conference are null, void, and of no effect. Calendar Item 358, the new transitional leave ¶ 354, is declared unconstitutional, and Calendar Item 359, which removed the language of a transitional leave from ¶ 354 of the Discipline, is also declared unconstitutional. The current language for a transitional leave as provided for in ¶ 354 is restored and maintained.”

The next questions are:  what mechanism do we have in place that will insure effectiveness of our clergy? How can the General Church adequately help the ineffective clergy in meeting the expectation of the church? What are we doing to make the pastoral vocation attractive for young generation of clergy who are contemplating joining this ministry? We all agree that we need congregational vitality, but still we are not able to diagnose the real problem that is causing decline in our church before offering solution. We are captivated in treating secondary causes while the primary cause lays beneath untouched. We read to rise up to reality and stop treating church like a business center.

 

Friday, October 26, 2012

REMOVAL OF GUARANTEED APPOINTMENT THE DILEMMA IN UMC


               
In the General Conference 2012 delegates made a major change to the long-standing United Methodist itinerancy system when they voted in favor of ending guaranteed appointments for ordained clergy. This change has given UMC bishops the right to end pastor’s career for “missional” purposes if they are found ineffective. The petition focused on paragraph 338 in the Book of Discipline, which states, in part, “Full-time service shall be the norm for ordained elders in the annual conference.”
The approved amendment to the paragraph includes, “The bishop may appoint an ordained elder, provisional member elder, or an associate member to less than full-time service. The clergyperson shall be notified at least 90 days prior to the annual conference at which the appointment shall be made. Special attention shall be given to ensure that the values of open itinerancy are preserved ...”
The legislation also permits bishops and their cabinets, with the approval of their boards of ordained ministry and annual conference’s executive session, to place elders on unpaid transitional leave for up to 24 months.
Each annual conference will name a task force to develop criteria impacting full time missional appointments.
The opponents of this legislation continued to express their disappointment, seeking to point out what they considered unintended consequences. On the final day of General Conference, a motion was made to request a declaratory decision from the Judicial Council to review the constitutionality of this new legislation.  The motion passed and the Judicial Council has placed this on their fall agenda. 
Reading blog commentaries of different people on this subject, Wes John has this to say “I am more than suspicious of the big push to give bishops the ability to end a pastor’s career for “missional” purposes. In the little experience the church has had with this new paradigm, “missional” seems to be a code word for favoritism. The committee’s “we have to do it this way because it’s right” attitude is equally unsettling. Why is this the best way of dealing with the situation? Why doesn’t each bishop publish a list of those clergy who are in their sights and then work with them to improve rather than be so anxious to kick them out? Why don’t they list the 85% of “underperforming churches” so that those churches can know they are considered as less than important? I get the feeling that the committee and those who are pushing for this huge change are doing so not out of collegiality or a love for the church but rather as a way of enhancing and cementing their own power and authority. The whole process feels a little like drilling holes in the bottom of the Titanic in order to let the water out” (comment on the United Methodist Reporter blog).
This matter is now before the judicial council, who will decide whether action taken by the 2012 General Conference, the denomination’s top legislative body, to end guaranteed full-time appointments for clergy is constitutional. In addition to the constitutional issue, the Judicial Council could weigh whether the 2012 General Conference actually made the intended change to guaranteed appointments at all, a question that arose after the controversial action was referred to the court.
In the General Conference 2012 delegates made a major change to the long-standing United Methodist itinerancy system when they voted in favor of ending guaranteed appointments for ordained clergy. This change has given UMC bishops the right to end pastor’s career for “missional” purposes if they are found ineffective. The petition focused on paragraph 338 in the Book of Discipline, which states, in part, “Full-time service shall be the norm for ordained elders in the annual conference.”
The approved amendment to the paragraph includes, “The bishop may appoint an ordained elder, provisional member elder, or an associate member to less than full-time service. The clergyperson shall be notified at least 90 days prior to the annual conference at which the appointment shall be made. Special attention shall be given to ensure that the values of open itinerancy are preserved ...”
The legislation also permits bishops and their cabinets, with the approval of their boards of ordained ministry and annual conference’s executive session, to place elders on unpaid transitional leave for up to 24 months.
Each annual conference will name a task force to develop criteria impacting full time missional appointments.
The opponents of this legislation continued to express their disappointment, seeking to point out what they considered unintended consequences. On the final day of General Conference, a motion was made to request a declaratory decision from the Judicial Council to review the constitutionality of this new legislation.  The motion passed and the Judicial Council has placed this on their fall agenda. 
Reading blog commentaries of different people on this subject, Wes John has this to say “I am more than suspicious of the big push to give bishops the ability to end a pastor’s career for “missional” purposes. In the little experience the church has had with this new paradigm, “missional” seems to be a code word for favoritism. The committee’s “we have to do it this way because it’s right” attitude is equally unsettling. Why is this the best way of dealing with the situation? Why doesn’t each bishop publish a list of those clergy who are in their sights and then work with them to improve rather than be so anxious to kick them out? Why don’t they list the 85% of “underperforming churches” so that those churches can know they are considered as less than important? I get the feeling that the committee and those who are pushing for this huge change are doing so not out of collegiality or a love for the church but rather as a way of enhancing and cementing their own power and authority. The whole process feels a little like drilling holes in the bottom of the Titanic in order to let the water out” (comment on the United Methodist Reporter blog).
This matter is now before the judicial council, who will decide whether action taken by the 2012 General Conference, the denomination’s top legislative body, to end guaranteed full-time appointments for clergy is constitutional. In addition to the constitutional issue, the Judicial Council could weigh whether the 2012 General Conference actually made the intended change to guaranteed appointments at all, a question that arose after the controversial action was referred to the court.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

UMC Judicial Council meets to determine legislative matters

Denominational discussions on job security for clergy and job evaluations for bishops are among the topics addressed in 18 docket items before the United Methodist Judicial Council at its Oct. 24–27 meeting in Elk Grove Village, Ill.
The top court will decide whether action taken by the 2012 General Conference, the denomination’s top legislative body, to end guaranteed full-time appointments for clergy is constitutional. In addition to the constitutional issue, the Judicial Council could weigh whether the 2012 General Conference actually made the intended change to guaranteed appointments at all, a question that arose after the controversial action was referred to the church court.
In a docket item that relates to the involuntary early retirement of Bishop W. Earl Bledsoe, the South Central Jurisdiction College of Bishops is requesting a declaratory decision on constitutionality of the church law provision the episcopacy committee referred to in making its decision on Bledsoe.
Paragraph 408.3 of the Book of Discipline, the denomination’s law book, says that a jurisdictional episcopacy committee, by a two-thirds vote, can place a bishop “in retired relation” if the committee finds it “to be in the best interests of the bishop and/or the Church.”
During the South Central Jurisdictional meeting in July, it was noted that the paragraph was amended at the 2012 General Conference. The amendment added a sentence that said the committee would need to report clearly the reason for a decision on involuntary retirement to the jurisdictional conference. The change took effect immediately.
Bledsoe himself has appealed to Judicial Council for a decision regarding his retirement. His appeal will be considered during a special session Nov. 9–11 in Phoenix.

Other issues before the council

The Western Pennsylvania Annual (regional) Conference has asked the top court to determine whether funds given to the East Africa Annual Conference by the former Pittsburgh East District were used in accordance with the intent of the donors as required by the 2008 Book of Discipline (Paragraph 258.4.f).
Concerns expressed by some in Western Pennsylvania are among the unanswered questions and accusations that have clouded several mission projects by U.S. United Methodist conferences working in East Africa.
Bishop Daniel Wandabula, episcopal leader for East Africa, has disputed the accounting concerns that also have led to the temporary suspension of funds by some church agencies.
The council will review a ruling by Wisconsin Area Bishop Linda Lee on questions of law regarding the conference’s proposed clergy covenant team. She said the questions were hypothetical and therefore not properly before the conference. The Judicial Council automatically reviews rulings on questions of law.
The clergy covenant team concept was initiated by the Rev. Amy DeLong, who was convicted of performing a same-sex union in 2011 and sentenced to a 20-day suspension and a yearlong process to “restore the broken clergy covenant relationship.”
Another document item reviews a bishop’s decision of law in the California-Pacific Annual Conference regarding the “Resolution in Response to General Conference 2012” approved on June 15.
The resolution renounces the denomination’s position “that homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching, and declare that it is itself incompatible with the life and teachings of Jesus Christ” and commits to building church communities inclusive of all people.
Other annual conferences this summer also debated or rejected the church stance on gay rights and same-sex marriage.

New council members

This will be the first regular session for the new Judicial Council, which convened in July for orientation. Two new members, as well as alternates, were elected during the 2012 General Conference last spring in Tampa, Fla.
Joining the council are the Rev. J. Kabamba Kiboko, originally from Southern Congo, now a clergy member of the Texas Annual (regional) Conference, and N. Oswald Tweh Sr., of the Liberian Annual Conference, both in Africa.
The Rev. Dennis L. Blackwell, Greater New Jersey Conference, and Beth Capen, New York Conference, were re-elected for a second term. The five council members continuing their eight-year terms are the Rev. William B. Lawrence, North Texas Conference; Angela Brown, California-Nevada; Ruben Reyes, Philippines; the Rev. Kathi Austin-Mahle, Minnesota and the Rev. F. Belton Joyner, North Carolina.
*Bloom is a United Methodist News Service multimedia reporter based in New York. Follow her at http://twitter.com/umcscribe. www.umu.org

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

WHO ARE THE UNITED METHODISTS?


The United Methodists are Evangelical Christian body who follow the teachings John Wesley; a former Anglican priest who was evicted from the Church of England for his fervent preaching on holiness.  One of my favorite quotations from this preacher is: “Do all the good you can . . .

in all the ways you can . . .

in all the places you can . . .

to all the people you can . . .

as long as ever you can.” This guy has travelled over 250, 000 miles on horseback, only to preach the message of love. The Christian body called The United Methodist Church is the result of his tireless effort. Today we have eight million (8m) United Methodists in the United States and another 3.5 million in countries around the world. Our congregations are deeply involved in their own communities and in outreach far from home. Both women and men are clergy/pastors.  We believe we are all in ministry together. Our decision-making bodies always include clergy and lay church members. We have two sacraments – baptism and communion – and our communion table is open to all (Yes, that really means everyone.), our name, Methodist, at first was a term meant to poke fun at our theological founder, John Wesley.

Who can be baptized? People of any age, from infancy through adulthood, but once is sufficient because it is God’s act, not a denomination’s. (If you were baptized in another faith and later join a United Methodist church, you can “confirm” or “reaffirm” that baptism, but God got it right the first time). How is baptism done? Ordinary water and the hands of a minister are the tools. (Most people get sprinkled, but some prefer pouring or immersion).

Communion! Just what is it? Communion is an act of worship that uses bread and wine (unfermented grape juice, actually) to open ourselves to God’s love, to remember Christ’s life and to be bound to a bigger community. Who is it for? United Methodists have an “open table.” It’s not “our” table, but the family table to which Jesus welcomed everyone and a sacred time of inclusion. (You don’t have to be a member. You don’t have to be baptized. You don’t have to be an adult. It really is open to all).

Our clergy! United Methodist pastors can be women or men, single or married. All are screened rigorously (background checks, psychological testing, the works). Ordination comes after years of full-time ministry. A church may have one or more ordained ministers or a person who is licensed for ministry.  Church staff may also include others who are schooled in music, Christian education, youth ministry and other disciplines.

After reading this don’t you think God is calling you for ministry in The United Methodist Church? If you felt called, respond to the gentle voice of the Holy Spirit! Be blessed.

 

References

1.      Wesley and the people called Methodist by: Richard P. Heitzenrater, 1995.

2.      John Wesley's sermons: an anthology by: Albert, C. et’ al, 1991

3.      Methodist Doctrine: The Essentials, 2nd Edition by: Campell, Ted A. 2011.

4.      The Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church 2012.

      5. www.rethinkchurch.com

 

 

 

 

Sunday, October 14, 2012

FACTS ABOUT UMC BISHOPS ELECTION OUTSIDE THE U.S



The United Methodist Church is not a congregational church in terms of leadership, it is a connectional church and its structure of administration is Episcopalian in nature. Therefore, The United Methodist Church is not the “Church of Nigeria” but the “Church in Nigeria.” Meaning it is an extension of other United Methodist Church around the globe, bond in leadership and administration. Wherever there is a break on this bond, it ceased to be United Methodist Church.
The United Methodist Church built its powers on conferences, either jurisdictional (in U.S.A) or central (outside U.S.A). The principal source of it authority is taken from what is called “the Wesleyan quadrilaterals;” which has the Bible, tradition, reason, and experience as the sources of decision making in the Church. The Wesleyan quadrilaterals are the basis in which the church form it constitution called “The Book of Discipline.” In this book every decision concerning spirituality, administration, leadership, and governance of the Church is driven.  

That is why some time it is very hard for people outside the church to understand the polity and administration of the Church. If people outside the church want to meaningfully contribute to the success of this church, it is paramount that they should understand the polity and administrative procedures of the church. Rather than depending on hear saying, and receiving information from unsubstantial sources that are saturated in sectionalism, tribalism, malice, egocentrism, and nepotism.  The world is now a global village, substantial information are available for everyone to access online. It is safer and reliable to read these things from a reliable source than to depend on egoistic information circulating verbally.

Regarding election, consecration, and assignment of UMC bishops, detail are found in paragraph 404-415 of the Book of Discipline 2008, the 2012 Book of Discipline has not make any remarkable changes regarding election. However, these paragraphs may require interpretation as they may content terminologies that are only understood by people who have familiarized themselves with the church law. Here are some abstract from these paragraph that will help you understand how bishops are elected in UMC.

First and famous I will like you to know that there is a difference in the way bishops are elected in jurisdictional conferences (in U.S.A) and central conferences (outside U.S.A). In U.S jurisdictional conferences, the election of bishops is determined by the number of church members. “Each jurisdiction having 300, 000 church members or fewer shall be entitled to five bishops and each jurisdiction having more than 300, 000 church members shall be entitled to one additional bishop for each additional 300,000 church members or major fraction thereof” (404.2a BOD 2008).  Outside U.S, central conferences the numbers of bishops is determined on the basis of missional needs. The request for a bishop is approved by the General Conference, when recommended by the Standing Committee on Central Conference matters (404.1 BOD 2008).

The question is; at the recommendation and approval of the General Conference, how is central conference bishop elected?

Constitutionally, there are four stages involved in nomination and election of a bishop; one is barely the responsibility of the annual conferences while the other three are exercised only by the central conferences:

1.       Naming of nominee(s) by annual conference (405.1 BOD 2008).

2.       Election of one among the annual conference nominee(s) or nomination and election of different nominee(s) by the central conference (405.1 BOD 2008).

3.       Consecration of the elected person as a bishop at the session of the central conference by the bishops from central (405.2c BOD 2008);

4.       Assignment of the elected bishop by the central conference committee on episcopacy after consultation with the college of bishops, with the support of the central conference (406.2 BOD 2008).

It is worth noting that the power of ascertaining the appropriate procedures for election is only vested on central conference. In other words, central conference is the constitutional/ legal body that has the right to elect a bishop for a particular area. Such person can come from any annual conference provided he/she is a full member of an annual conference within that region (405.1 BOD 2008). “The jurisdictional or central conferences are authorized to fix the percentage of votes necessary to elect a bishop. It is recommended that at least 60 percent of those present and voting be necessary to elect” (405.2b BOD 2008).

When a bishop is elected following the above procedures, he/she is said to be dually elected a United Methodist bishop, not only for his/her area but UMC globally.

He/she can only be removed from the status of a UMC bishop whenever convicted of the following chargeable offenses: “Immorality including but not limited  to, not being celibate in singleness or not faithful in a heterosexual marriage, practices declared by The United Methodist Church to be incompatible with Christian teachings, including but not limited to: being a self-avowed practicing homosexual or conducting ceremonies which celebrate homosexual union; or performing same-sex wedding ceremonies; crime; failure to perform the work of the ministry; disobedience to the order and discipline of The United Methodist Church; dissemination of doctrines contrary to the established standard of doctrine of The United Methodist Church; relation and/ or behavior that undermines the ministry of another pastor; child abuse, sexual abuse; sexual misconduct or harassment, or racial or gender discrimination” (2702.1 BOD 2008).

It is only under such offenses would a bishop be charged and if found guilty he/she will receive penalty as the judicial council may deem fit.

 

Friday, October 12, 2012

Is Religion Against Humanity?


Economic security and sheer power are the remote and immediate reasons why people polarized in the Church. It is unfortunate that religion in history is used as a major force by egoistic persons to control the minds, attitudes, and action of the unwitting folks in the society; to sacrifice their happiness, families, friends, and the welfare of the society to fight for power and give it to these egoistic persons.

If you look closely at people who claimed they are fighting for God, beneath their claims and motive God is far way. They have discovered that religion is the easiest weapon of manipulation, easily used in history to retained political and economic power. Incite the unwitting folks to go and fight and bring power to the so-called “our leaders.”

If their claims are truly godly, why not let God to fight his battle Himself? Or do you think God is incapable of fighting His battle that he needs your help? Please be reasonable, don’t allow someone to lure you into fight with your families, friends, and your society in the name of church, religion, tribe, section or nepoty.

For many years we have made for ourselves a god that demands and receives the sacrifice of anything or anyone who gets in our ways. Let’s allow God to fight His battle in His own way.

Monday, October 8, 2012

NEW BISHOP ELECTED FOR UMC NIGERIA

FREETOWN, Sierra Leone (UMNS) — The Rev. John Wesley Yohanna of the Mungo Dosso area in Nigeria has been elected a United Methodist bishop by delegates of the West Africa Central Conference. Yohanna, 49, succeeds Bishop Arthur Kulah who was recalled from retirement about five years ago to lead the Nigeria Episcopal Area.
The Nigeria Episcopal Area encompasses three annual (regional) conferences — the Central Nigeria, the Northern Nigeria and Southern Nigeria annual conferences.
Bishop John Wesley Yohanna is consecrated Oct. 7 at King Memorial United Methodist Church in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Yohanna is a new bishop of the Nigeria Episcopal Area. UMNS web-only photos by Phileas Jusu.
“I have a huge responsibility resting on my shoulders,” Yohanna said. “It is to pursue peace as articulated by West Africa Central Conference theme (‘Seek Peace and Pursue It’). I need to serve the people of the United Methodist Church in Nigeria and show servanthood leadership to ensure transparency in every transaction that I make and picking everybody along the peace and development process,” said Yohanna.
Yohanna was elected Oct. 6 at Bishop Baughman Memorial United Methodist Church on the first ballot with 57 votes of the 65 clergy and laity delegates from the four nations that form the West Africa Central Conference — Cote D’Ivoire, Liberia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone.
Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa and the seventh most populous worldwide, according to the CIA World Factbook. Half of the nation’s roughly 170 million people are Muslim, while 40 percent are Christian. That religious division has been a source of violence in recent years.
“Since my election Saturday night, I have received several calls from non-Christians congratulating me on my election victory, and they are looking forward to working with me as the bishop of The United Methodist Church. With the foundation already laid by General Board of Church and Society workshops, we will be able to continue with interfaith dialogue in our Episcopal Area,” Yohanna said.
Challenges facing Nigeria
Nigeria faces other challenges. As of 2009, the country had the world’s second highest number of people — 3.3 million — living with HIV and AIDS.
“I will work hard to restore the functionality of the hospitals and health centers within the episcopal area,” he said. “We need skilled volunteers, sufficient medical equipment and drugs to keep our medical institutions running. Once we have the machinery in place, we would be ready to combat malaria and HIV effectively.”
Beside this, malaria has taken its toll on Nigerian rural and suburban population. The 2012 Malaria Consortium report indicate that 2,969,950 cases were reported in 2007 out of which 10,289 died.
Bishop Yohanna waves to the cheering crowd as he joins the west African bishops and the presiding bishop, Julius Trimble, (right) after his election.
Yohanna has to help glue together the leadership of three annual conferences. There have been internecine fights among various church leadership caucuses.
Those squabbles affected the West Africa Central Conference gathering. Only one annual conference in the Nigeria Episcopal Area — the Central Nigeria Conference — sent delegates to the gathering.
A communique signed by the 13 absent delegates titled “TOTAL BOYCOTT OF THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN NIGERIA ANNUAL CONFERENCE DELEGATES TO THE 2012 WEST AFRICAN CENTRAL CONFERENCE” reads in part: “Any attempt to impose or elect anybody on our behalf will not be acceptable to us in the interest of peace, unity, justice and fairness”.
The release cited a flawed process leading to the nomination of episcopal candidates, unresolved boundary demarcation disputes and doubt over the fairness of Bishop Arthur Kulah in the process as key among other reasons for the boycott.
Wants to build bridges
Yohanna said he will seek to build bridges with supporters of the boycott.
“I will engage everybody in having dialogues with all stakeholders, and these are the common people in the church whose voices have been drowned for too long,” he said. “In the church of Jesus Christ, we learnt a leadership model from Master Jesus. Christ came to reach those at the bottom to bring them to the top as evidenced in the scripture that says ‘if I am lifted up, I will draw people to myself’ (John 12:32).”
In a similar vein, Yohanna said leadership is not thinking of being at the apex, but it is about the people at the base. It is about offering more privileges to the less fortunate.
In the West Africa Central Conference, like the United States, a bishop is elected for life on his or her first election.
Before his election, Yohanna was the administrative assistant to the bishop of the Nigeria Episcopal Area. He was district superintendent in the Central Nigeria Annual Conference from 2005 to 2010. He has served in several positions in the Central Nigeria Annual Conference including director, Council on Ministries; secretary, Board of Ordained Ministry and a pastor at Saladuna and Piribi local churches. He was also an instructor at Ahmadu Bello University at Zaria-Banyam Theological Seminary from 1991 to1993.
Born to staunch Evangelical United Brethren parents, Yohanna spent his formative years in the Karim Lamido local government area of Taraba State, Nigeria.
The Evangelical United Brethren missionaries had a lasting impact on his parents, and they handed down to him and his siblings an unshakeable faith. He draws inspiration from the name John Wesley, founder of the Methodist movement, and this has seen him through his faith journey fraught with various challenges from persecutions in the church and threats of arrests. God held him with God’s victorious right hand, the bishop said.
“My prayer for Nigeria Episcopal Area is to restore peace in the Nigeria UMC by going to the people, discussing with the people and finding solutions together with the people,” he said.
Another issue Yohanna discussed was to restore the church’s various ministries, namely aviation, education, agriculture and medical.
Furthermore, Yohanna hopes to improve visibility by increasing membership of The United Methodist Church in a predominantly Muslim area by reaching out to the eastern and western parts of Nigeria, even in Abuja, the federal capital of Nigeria.
“I pray that all the UMC boards and agencies will come to our aid at this juncture in the history of our church to move us from the lower rung of the ladder in order for us to reach the mountaintop in all our ministries,” he said.
Yohanna was consecrated Sunday, Oct. 7, at King Memorial United Methodist Church in Freetown, Sierra Leone  (source UMC NEW UMC.org).

Saturday, September 29, 2012

INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS CALL TO COME TO THE AID OF AFRICA


Shalom Praise Ministry is an emerging interdenominational ministry (based in Nigeria) dedicated to holistic transformation of Africa; using Nigeria as a starting point, is crying for justice in Africa by calling individuals and organizations in U.S.A and Europe who are passionate of seeing Africa developed holistically to respond to this this glamorous call.
This ministry is currently working to transform Nigeria, and using it as a point of contact to transform other African countries as well. You may ask, why Nigeria?
With more than 155 million people, Nigeria is Africa’s most populous nation and its second-largest economy after South Africa. As Africa’s largest producer of oil and one of the top five suppliers of U.S and Europe oil imports, Nigeria plays an important role in the global economy. Nigeria plays a vital role in UN Peace Keeping Mission in many African countries and beyond. In essence, transforming Nigeria is as the same as transforming the whole of Africa.
It is sad to discovered that 70% of incomes generated in Nigeria goes to corruption; independent research has revealed that, the money Nigeria lost to corruption is twice the amount U.S.A and UN used in developing Africa. This money is not stolen to developed Nigeria; if it were so, there wouldn’t be much trouble, but rather the money is stolen and transferred to other countries.
Tragically, Nigeria is now faces serious challenges, including an increasingly sophisticated and deadly wave of Islamic extremism (known as Boko Haram; meaning western education is a sin), pervasive corruption, injustices, and growing levels of poverty and income inequality. Poverty levels are rising, with more than 60% of the population living on less than a dollar a day, and indicators such as income distribution, health, and literacy indicate a sharp North-South divide. Diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, HIV/Aids, maternal and infant mortality are prevalent most especially in Northern Nigeria.
These are the reason why Shalom Praise Ministry is embarking on transformation of Africa, using Nigeria as a starting point; we believe transforming Nigeria is the same as transforming Africa (our motto is: hope for Africa), we have a 15 years plan; to make the average Africans know their fundamental human right.
This ministry has four areas of focus that need contribution in any way possible from individual and organizations in the U.S.A and Europe: (1) Social justice and economic advocacy (human right) deals with issues relating to justice and fairness, (2) Poverty and diseases eradication advocacy (PDEA) deals with issues of poverty and disease free society in Africa, (3) Center for Spiritual advocacy (CSA) deals with interfaith dialogue most especially among Muslims and Christians, (4) Educational empowerment advocacy (EEA) deals with seeking support and exploring educational opportunities to Africans most especially the young ones .
This is nonprofit organization, to read more visit http://www.pastorandyministry.com. To support, partner or inquiry contact: Pastor Ande I. Emmanuel; pastoandy@yahoo.com or call: +12027354979

PARTNERS, MENTORS AND VOLUNTEERS NEEDED

Shalom Praise Ministry, a young emerging ministry in Africa; with an interdenominational background dedicated to the mission of holistic transformation of Africa, is hereby seeking for partners, mentors, and volunteers who are willing to be part of the new vision targeting holistic transformation of Africa; using Nigeria as a starting point.
This ministry has four areas of focus; (1) Social justice and economic advocacy (human right), (2) Poverty and diseases eradication advocacy (PDEA), (3) Center for Spiritual advocacy (CSA), (4) Educational empowerment advocacy (EEA).
This nonprofit organization is seeking people who will volunteer to serve as Directors in each of the above areas.
This organization is also seeking for partners and mentors who will assist in providing awareness and sensitization on how to run a nonprofit organization to effectively achieve it stated goals.
The Voluntary Directors should possess the following qualifications:
- Passion for socio-economic and religio-political development of Africa,
- Passion for egalitarianism in African society,
- Passion toward violence free society in Africa, starting from where you are,
- Possess some knowledge on public policy advocacy,
- Possess some good communication and writing ability in English or any other developed country’s language, with good knowledge of computer e.g. all social networks,
- Should be willing to travel to any part of Africa.

If you are willing to be a volunteer, partner or mentor, please contact:
Pastor Ande I. Emmanuel at +1202-735-4979 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting +1202-735-4979 end_of_the_skype_highlighting or send an email to pastondy@yahoo.com
You can check the Shalom Praise Ministry website at http//:www.pastorandyministry.com

New Africa is Possible

Join the voyage for the transformation of Africa, share your visions and work your dreams. Let us unite and bring the best out of our continent Africa. A “New Africa is possible,” a nation where people can bring about meaningful change at all levels of live, a nation where poverty; diseases; violence; tribalism; sectionalism; geocentricism; nepotism; bribery, and corruption will be things of the past, a nation where there will be no class distinction; bridging the gap between the rich and the poor, the educated and the uneducated, a nation where religious tolerance will be valued; a nation where religion will be an instrument of development than division, a nation that esteemed the dignity of humanity; where everyone is optimistic that no matter one’s poor background he can still make it in life, a nation where there will be no kings and slaves; but citizens. We are not subjects of our respect countries but we are citizens. This new Africa is possible; join us at the SHALOM PRAISE MINISTRY an interdenominational ministry that is dedicated to the transformation of social, economic, political, and religious life of Africa as a whole. Through advocating for civil right, social, and economic justice, and maintaining the integrity of African societal heritage. Visit us at http://pastorandyministry.com/

Saturday, September 22, 2012

WORKING EXEGESIS OF REVELATION 13:11-18

WORKING EXEGESIS OF REVELATION 13:11-18

As a theologian, a clergy, and someone live in America, my Church members kept asking me whether the world is coming to an end in 2012, whether the mark of the beast 666 (Revelation 13:18) has come out/would come out in America, Whether President Obama's Health Care Bill; RFID Chip Implants is the 666 referred in the Scripture?

Because of questions, I felt
 obliged to draw a working exegesis of Revelation 13:11-18.

The second beast is identified in the Bible as a "false prophet" (16:13; 19:20; 20:10), this is a ancient reference to those who encourage worship of the Roman emperor and participation in Roman idolatry (empirical religion). The prophets performs miracle (Mark 13: 21-23; 2Thess. 2:9-10). The "mark of the beast" should not be interpreted literal, it point to economic discrimination endured by faithful Christians under Roman leadership (200 BC-400 AD), during this period only those who paid homage to the statue of the emperor are allowed to buy and sale ( Church historians call them "the lapse").

The number of the beast (666) is the sum of the numerical value of it letters. John wrote this before the invention of the Arabic numerals we now use. The language the author knows and uses was-Greek, Latin, Aramaic, and Hebrew all have used numbers as equivalent to letters, that very name has a numerical sum. Theologically scholars have identifies the beast who once bear the 666 as "Emperor Nero" (ca. 54-68). His numerical total in Hebrew is 666. Nero was the first emperor who started persecuting the church. Emperor Domitian (ca. 81-96) exiled John in the island of Patmos. So John while in exile thought Nero has come to life. There is no Biblical or traditional connection between Obama’s regime and mark of the beast.

MY CRITIQUE

-The Bible refers to the beast as "second beast," if Obama is the second beast who then is the first beast? I guess you will say Bush! Then you are wrong.

-The Bible says the beast is a "false prophet" we all know Obama is not a prophet, in case you don't know, he is a politician.

-Again the Bible says the beast has power to perform miracle, we know Obama has never perform miracle.

-The Bible says the mark of the beast is for the whole nations of the earth, but Obama's RFID Chip Implants is only for US citizens. What about other nations? When would their mark arrive?

-You see! Please stop using the Bible to tarnish the image of America and Obama. The man is really doing a good job.

(Reference: The New Interpreters Study Bible 2003).

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Tenure Misconception of UMC Central Conference bishops

THE LIFE TENURE MISS CONCEPTION OF CENTRAL CONFERENCE BISHOPS

I decided to put together this piece of information, to help my colleagues and friends in UMC Nigeria at time of electing a new bishop for the Nigeria Episcopal Area. It can be 
recall that one of the remote causes of the 2004 conflict in UMC Nigeria was the misconception of the “Life tenure of the bishop.” As many interpreted it to mean “the bishop will remain in office until his death.” Misconception- believe it or not has caused a great lost in UMC Nigeria, a lost that will cause us many years to recover. As we are making arrangement to elect another bishop, it will be good if we understand the basic tips on bishop’s election.

WHO IS A BISHOP

In the UMC terminology, a bishop is an elder who is elected to provide a “spiritual leadership” to the Church. He or she preside over Annual and Central Conferences (regional areas of the church), play an important leadership role in helping to set the direction of the church and its mission throughout the world (BOD 49. 2008, URL: http://www.umccouncilofbishops.org/). This implies that who so ever is to be elected for this office must be spiritually disciplined in the Word of God, must have proven leadership ability, and must be ready to be servant to God and humanity.

NOMINATION OF A BISHOP

An annual conference, in the session immediately prior to the next regular session of jurisdiction or central conference, is given the power to nominate one or more people to be elected as bishop at the session of jurisdiction or central conference. These nominees can come from among all active clergy of the said annual conference, and information about them must be sent to all delegates in the jurisdictional or central conferences (BOD 405.1, 2008).
It is required in UMC that annual conference in nominating candidates for bishop, shall give due consideration to the inclusiveness of The United Methodist Church with respect to gender, race, and national origin (meaning all active clergy in good stand are eligible to be nominated provide they met the provision in BOD 401, 2008 (BOD 405. 2a, 2008).
Annual conference is authorized to fix the percentage of votes necessary for nomination, but it must not be less than 60 percent of the total vote (BOD 405. 2b, 2008).

ELECTION OF A BISHOP

Election of a bishop is the same as the nomination; only difference is bishops are elected in jurisdictional or central conferences.
Bishops are elected by the jurisdictional conferences in the United States and by the central conferences outside of the United States. “Any clergy member of an annual conference is eligible to be elected a bishop. Nominations or endorsements of individuals are common, but not necessary for election....The number of votes needed to elect a bishop is determined by each jurisdictional or central conference but the Book of Discipline recommends that at least 60 percent of those present and voting be required to elect. Bishops are consecrated at the jurisdictional or central conference session which they were elected” (BOD 405. 2c, 2008).

TENURE OF A BISHOP

I want to start this paragraph by saying that, one of the biggest problems of The United Methodist Church in Nigeria (UMCN) is the tenure of a bishop.
In Central Conferences, bishops are elected for a specific term. If not reelected at the end of the term, the bishop returns to the pastorate and is no longer considered a bishop. Bishops who retire while serving their term are considered bishops for life. In the Africa Central Conference, bishops who are reelected for a second term then become bishops for life. The phrase “bishop for life” means; when they retired after serving all their elected terms, they become part of the council of bishop and would be addressed retired bishop for life.
By the decision of the West Africa Central Conference (WACC 2008), central conference bishops can serve up to a second term (a term is a period of 4 years known as quadrennial), after their second term, they can be elected for a term again, after which they cannot continue as bishop, but can retire and be bishop for life (all bishop are required to retire when they are 68) BOD 50, 2008.

RECOMMENDATION

I felt obliged as your brother in diaspora to bring forth this recommendation. Several years of working as a pastor in Nigeria has taught me that we can do better in the future despite the predicament that has befallen our Church in the previous years. The future of our Church is bright only if we have a leader that is spiritually discipline and has a positive vision of the future. We may have this type of leader if this election is conducted under the following conditions:
- Conducted beyond tribalism and sectionalism.
- Conducted looking at one’s spiritual and physical achievements in life of the church.
- 50% look at academic advancement is a good advantage.
- 10% look at number of years in the church because there are a lot of people who have being in this church for decades, yet they haven’t contributed anything meaningful in life of the church.
- Conducted regardless of gender.
- No any recommendation from cabinet or executive, delegates should bring forth names from the bar of the annual conference and those who have 60 percent of the total vote cast should be the nominees.
- We should understand that what divide us is less significant compared to what unite us.
We at Wesley Theological Seminary are seriously praying for you. Go forth in faith, may the peace of the Lord be with you (1 Tim 3:2; Titus 1:6), which spirit fill nomination and subsequent election.


REFERENCES
The BOOK of DISCIPLINE of the United Methodist Church 2008
URL:http://www.umc.org/
URL:http://www.umccouncilofbishops.org/

Yours in God’s service
Ande Emmanuel

WE MUST STOP TRIBALISM, NEPOTISM, AND SECTIONALISM IN UMC NIGERIA


We must stop tribalism, Nepotism, and Sectionalism in UMC Nigeria



My is Ande I. Emmanuel, I am an ordained clergy of the United Methodist Church in Nigeria. I currently live in the United States doing a master's program in theology. 



As bishop election for UMC Nigeria episcopal area approaches, I want to call your attention to some useful tips that would in election an " ideal " person who will save UMC Nigeria from the menace of tribal crises that has engulfed the church for the past eight years.


The challenge of finding a spirit filled and devoted pastor to became the bishop of The United Methodist Church Nigeria Episcopal Area is enormous. The UMC Church in Nigeria for so many years was engulfed in crises which has reduced the church from dynamic equilibrium to amnesia and nostalgia. All these happened as a result of selfishness, tribalism, nepotism, and sectionalism has eaten deep into the fabric of the Church. What shall we do? 

This answer to this question lies on who becomes the bishop. I draw this note to remind you of the role God has placed you to play in electing "the ideal" candidate for the enormous task of uniting The United Methodist Church in Nigeria. As the West African Central Conference approaches, I want you to know that you have the responsibility of voting to change the situation in UMC Nigeria, your vote would determine the faith of the church in Nigeria for only God knows how long.

I want want to tell you that with the way the nomination is going in Nigeria, we are optimistic that God is in processes of transforming The United Methodist Church in Nigeria from further decline to dynamic equilibrium, from resigned passiveness to confident plans and actions, from introversion to extroversion, and amnesia or nostalgia to robust sense of a congregational vitality. One thing that is worth noting is God can use you to perfect this his plan of restoration in Nigeria.

I do want you to keep in mind that UMC Nigeria wants "the ideal" candidate, some one who has deep experience with people, some who can build unity in diversity in the church, some one who is not tribal; not sectional, not selfish, and does not support nepotism. Some who can bring together the separated wall of unity in UMC Nigeria. He "the ideal" person is among the nominee coming to the West Africa Central Conference, I encourage you as brothers and sisters in Christ to vote form him. Remember you have a divine assignment to change situation in UMC Nigeria, by voting for this "ideal" candidate (may God bless you as you do so). I hope to see you in person during the central conference, have a good day.

Rev. Ande I. Emmanuel
Wesley Theological Seminary
Cell phone: +1 202-735-4979